Copyright 2007-2011 JessicaMah.com. Theme by Cory Watilo.

How much money should my company raise?

Over the past few weeks, I've come to notice that companies known for raising absurds amount of money are often founded by entrepreneurs who've succeeded multiple times before.  Off the top of my head, there's Color ($42M), Flipboard ($10M A-round, $50M follow-on), Adkeeper ($8M A, $35M follow-on 4 months later), and plenty others that raised $5M-$10M before even launching.  

At first I thought this was crazy, but I think I finally understand.  Building a good software firm is far more expensive than people may think -- yes, you could have 5 guys sitting in a living room coding, and that costs virtually nothing.  This is how inDinero was just a year ago, and we figured that everyone raising more than $1M pre-launch was crazy.  Boy were we wrong...  

Ends up that it costs a lot of money to build a real business.  You have office expenses, server costs, and employees who would rather not live off ramen-level salaries.  Building features takes 3X longer when you're no longer incubating, because you care about testing and reliablity, you're dividing your time between building features and assisting existing customers, and you now care about writing maintanable code.  All your fundraising budgets were based around time to develop functionality, and now they're completely wrong.  Before you know it, you're raising 2X-3X the original amount you sought to raise.

When I first went out to raise inDinero's angel round, we were looking to raise between $250k-$500k.  But since we were getting a lot of competition for our deal, we thought we'd raise more.  Before we knew it, we were up to $1M in commitments, and thought we had more cash than we ever knew what to do with.  12 months later, we've realized that this was the best thing to happen to us.  As one of our angel investors put it to us, "given favorable terms, raise as much money as possible."  His rationality was two-fold:  1) the bubble won't last forever, and 2) startups cost more money and require more time than the entrepreneur ever predicts.  

First-time entrepreneurs frequently ask "how much should I raise?", to which most investors respond "enough to get you to the next inflection point, which should be 12-18 months."  From a practical perspective, you should raise money in small chunks only on an as-needed basis.  But this is flawed thinking.  In order to do a successful fundraise, the entrepreneur has to drop everything they're doing, create competition and hype for their investment round, hope that the market doesn't dry up in the middle of their raise, and hope that the amount they raise lasts them until their "next inflection point".  The concept of raising money in small batches no longer seems as feasible anymore.

If I had to do it over again, here's how I'd think about the "how much to raise" question:

1 - Create a budget for 18 months of runway.  Factor in $5k/month for rent, internet, electricity.  Throw in $100k/year for servers, marketing experiments, conferences, travel, etc... Budget at least $80k/employee in payroll, benefits, insurance, and misc costs.  (you'll have to budget more if you plan on hiring more experienced talent)  edit:  we've been able to pay less than market rate purely because we offer more in equity.  But there have been potential hires who have higher financial requirements who we haven't been able to consider because of our budget restraints.

2 - Multiply this number by 2 because it'll take twice as long to execute on product roadmap.

3 - Increase the total runway by another 12 months in case the financing markets dry up. (**I believe this is likely to happen)

4 - Assume that I'll be talking to investors when I have 6-8 months of runway remaining, which means this so called "inflection point" actually needs to happen way sooner than you think.  

---

The amount you'll raise will obviously depend on how expensive your engineers are and how much revenue you're generating.  But if you run this exercise against your original prediction of how much you "need" to raise, you'll find that your intuition is probably off.  inDinero's original plan to raise $250k-$500k ended up being $1M, and though I couldn't understand why we needed that much, it ended up being the right thing to do.  

My only regret is not raising even more.

 

| Viewed
times | Favorited 2 times

21 Comments

Aug 08, 2011
sandieman said...
As a younger entrepreneur evaluating the scene we have 37signals thinking saying "don't raise anything" and SV thinking saying "raise as much as possible, terms are favorable".

It's very interesting hearing you would have raised even more at this time, especially with how cashflow conscious your product/company is.

Keep up the great work!

Aug 08, 2011
spankingnotions said...
Fred Wilson had a post on this same topic:
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2011/07/how-much-money-to-raise.html

In general Fred does not advise raising beyond 18 months per round (assuming the dilution is within 10%-20%). This is because a company can raise money for less equity in later rounds. Thus an extra 12 months safety cushion sounds too dilutive unless required for a specific situation.

Aug 08, 2011
Jessica M said...
I'd recommend looking into venture debt to lessen the dilution -- this way you get best of both worlds.
Aug 11, 2011
brad dunn said...
This is really insightful. I'm fascinated by all this stuff at the moment, and these kind of conversations are taking up more and more time. Great post Jess.
Aug 11, 2011
brianmwang said...
Jessica, I don't have much to say beyond "I admire your insight on this issue." While it's true that these days it's cheaper than ever to start a company, it still costs far more than most think to *build a business.* The popular narrative has been shifting people's expectations too far into the realm of "I only need a few hundred thousand to really get this thing off the ground" and I believe this is pretty dangerous thinking. Thanks for injecting some much needed perspective into the discussion.
Aug 11, 2011
kenberger said...
"My only regret is not raising even more."-- bucking convention! Very down to earth thinking, as usual, JM.
Aug 11, 2011
Iain Dooley said...
Hi Jessica, I'm interested to know what point your business was at technology and market-wise when you were raising this money. Did you have a product-market fit? ie. were you already selling to the same customers you intended to sell to when your product was finished? Was the technology finished? I'm trying to figure out where I sit in between "seed" and "angel" funding. The closest approximation in terms of scope and technology to my product Decal CMS is something like OnSwipe where Jason and crew reportedly raised a $1mil "seed round" presumably to finish developing the tech once they had a functional (or semi-functional) prototype. Do you see a fundamental difference between something like InDinero which is not innovating so much on the technology side, but innovating more on the "business" side (ie. not so R&D heavy) and something like OnSwipe (or Decal :) which is more about innovation on the front lines of technology, and how and when (and how much!) each of these two cases should raise money differently?
Aug 11, 2011
MarkHall123 said...
Hi Jessica. First off, thanks for a great post. My question is this: How do you rationalize/explain to a VC that your investment ask amount includes your "assumption" that it will take longer to get things done & that you need the extra cash for the expectation of a further runway? Basically, will a VC ask why you are asking for a lot more than you actually need to get to the next inflection point? Thanks.
Aug 11, 2011
Jessica M said...
Thanks for the kind words, Brad, Brian, Ken!
Aug 11, 2011
Jessica M said...
There is no "right" answer to what you should do.  It depends on the type of business and what you're trying to do.

For example, inDinero is about building product.  But Groupon at a similar stage is about hiring sales reps.. and if they can ramp that up (even if it's unprofitable at first), then they should go out and raise as much money as they possibly can, as soon as they know what the cost to acquire a customer is.

Technology investments also require more money upfront.  R&D takes time and is very costly on the payroll front, so I would take as much as I could get.  See Tesla Motors and SpaceX to see what I mean...
Aug 11, 2011
Jessica M said...
Hey Mark,

I'd actually tell them my thinking.  "Here's my budget, here's what I'm going to do to extend runway longer because I know things will cost more money and take longer than both of us will care to admit."  A good VC will understand this rationalization, a subpar VC will make you run in circles to justify it.

Hope this answers your question.



Aug 11, 2011
AdamWinter said...
I fully agree with this. A company with cash doesn't go bankrupt. Things happen as mentioned above. Also the ability to respond with a pivot. Pretty rare to be able to raise a follow-on round saying "yeah, the first idea didn't so much have a market we'll take the technology and spin it another way". Also be aware that if you start seeking cash with six months of runway left, it better be pretty clear that real traction has been achieved. You will be nearing fumes by the time the round closes, and that is scary. As an investor, I have no problem writing a check and losing it. But writing a second check to a company that didn't achieve milestones (and none ever do), and losing that, that is a bitter pill. Second rounds can be tricky, so raise enough in the first round to achieve unquestionable traction for the second round. Raising more at a better valuation is great but only as long as they have enough cash to get there.
Aug 11, 2011
Jessica M said...
Good points, Adam.

To build off your point on raising more cash with < 6 months of cash left, it's a pretty bold bet to wait until that late to raise a bridge financing.  I'd probably start raising more with 12 months of cash left if I forsaw what was to happen.


Aug 12, 2011
Allen said...
Interesting that there is nothing in your post that says, "get more customers to grow the business" versus "get vc to grow the business". Would Groupon be a household name today if they didn't take nearly 1 billion in vc? Of course not - but maybe they wouldn't have the issues they have today either.
Aug 12, 2011
erinrobertz liked this post.
Aug 13, 2011
Marc Anthony Rosa liked this post.
Aug 15, 2011
cliveb said...
Terrific perspective. Dave McClure et al seems like a self serving spray and pray VC: "Business plans are bullshit". The difference seems to be doing a startup versus building a startup company. A startup can be fueled by ramen. Building a valuable applications company costs lots.
Aug 19, 2011
Kyle Wong said...
Hey Jess,

Great post! You mentioned in your post that you were able to pay less for developers because you offered more equity. How large was the employee option package that you set up?

Aug 22, 2011
Ike said...
Jessica, I read your post on CNN Money and loved it, then decided to search for your blog which I have subscribed to. Anyways, in what stage of a start-up can you start raising funds? What's the big trigger; sales/revenue or growth potential?
Aug 22, 2011
Jessica M said...
Hey Ike - I think the trigger is as soon as you *know* that your product is worth paying money for.  In our case, we had customers paying us money, and that gave us the hint that we had the potential to build a real business out of inDinero.
Sep 05, 2011
This system is turning out to be a very good way to make more money online and till now many people have been benefiting from it. After signing up, it takes 2-3 days to be accepted by Google. They will send a message if your website is not selected. Website content is the main criterion for getting approved. So in that case change the website content. Try to put your unique and interesting content; it's for sure that your site will be accepted.

Leave a comment...