Permission to Fail
If there’s one thing I learned in this web 2.0 world, it’s “fail fast”.
If there’s one thing I learned from my asian parents, it’s “failure is not an option“. I hated my parents for this growing up, but I’ve come to appreciate it.
When you go into something knowing that there’s no option to fail, you hustle in ways that the less paranoid never would. The impact of this is incredible, and I think that a good way to increase your chances of succeeding is to find ways to make it so that failure is as far from an option as possible.
This means burning all of your ships: leaving school, quitting your job, and telling everyone you know that you’re working on a startup. Since taking grant and investment money from numerous people, I’ve felt a personal pressure to push forward that I hadn’t before. I’m obliged not to fail, and my productivity is noticeably stronger now.
A few things that I don’t approve of:
1) People who do “consulting on the side“. These almost always fail, because the entrepreneur isn’t in a sink-or-swim mentality. They justify it by citing how much money they make through such little work, and that’s all true. But no matter what, at the end of the day, the entrepreneur is giving him or herself the permission to screw up the company and go back to the financial security that freelance consulting provides. I say they burn their ships and focus on what they actually care about.
2) Doing school while building a company. It doesn’t work at all. I tried it back in middle school, I tried it in high school, and I tried it as a junior and senior at Berkeley. Even if you say that you don’t care about your grades, it doesn’t matter, because you’re inevitably going to lose productivity and give yourself more permission to fail. As Paul Graham says in one of his essays that student entrepreneurs can always go back to school and discount their failure as a side project that didn’t go anywhere. And that’s why it makes me cringe when I hear my classmates applying to grad school or jobs so that they have a “backup option”.
Which brings me to the worst offender:
3) Keeping your job, making business a “side-thing”. This implies that you won’t quit the security of your job until there’s traction or investment funding, yet you’re not going to find either unless you’re working day and night on your startup. It’s a catch-22, and something has to give. I remember meeting people last year who said they were working on a startup, yet keeping their jobs in the meanwhile. They said that they were “considering leaving their job”, which meant that they were too scared to do so. A year later, they’re still in the same job, and their startup didn’t go anywhere.
The main critique to burning one’s ships is that you’re incurring huge risk by doing so. If you don’t have any backup options, what happens if and when your company fails? If I had to answer, I’d say that it won’t come to that, because you forfeited all permission to fail by leaving your backup options on the table. But realistically speaking, it’s not that bad. You’re a great engineer working on your new startup, but Google’s trying to recruit you to work there. Tell them to go away, and they’ll probably be back in the event that your company fails.
Now proactive things you can do to decrease your permission to fail:
- Telling everyone you know about your company. Every time you see friends, they’ll ask you “how’s your company doing?” And you’re going to want to have good things to say.
- Join an early stage accelerator program like YCombinator or TechStars. I think this is critical, because you feel an immense amount of pressure to stay on top of all of your peers. You want to save yourself the embarrassment of having a crappy product to show for, and you don’t want to let down your earliest backers. Because they’re counting on you.
To sum this all up, it comes down to one thing: psychology. There’s an incredible psychological impact of knowing that you can’t fail, and it’s artificially tapping into your evolutionary instincts. If you perceive that you’re about to get killed, you’re going to work that much harder to stay alive.
May 5th, 2010 at 7:34 pm
I definitely agree, but I think I’ll go ahead and be one of the first ones to defend the #3’s, since I am a member
In my case, I have a HUGE startup in my head. Not a standard Web 2.0 product, an Enterprise management product, think along the scale of SCOM/SCCM/OpenManage/OpenView/etc. I KNOW that the effort required to accomplish the minimum finished product that I want to, to get to ramen profitablity, and to make a zillion-trillion-billion dollars will be MUCH more than typical startups, and this is just from a coding perspective (not counting setting up the biz, funding, etc). So I know (or maybe just think/believe) that if I can go for X number of days without working my normal job, I can get a ramen profitable version of my app completed.
The problem I have is that X number of days is WAY out of my reach, meaning that I don’t have enough money to cover my expenses while not working-for-the-man and that X number of days is too much time to take off work (can’t do it on a vacation, by the time I get back…by the time I get back I’ll have been replaced).
The only way I can think of to work around this problem is to get angel/VC funding up front (Y-Combinator, et al, primarily focus on Web 2.0). Given that my product is totally different from typical startups nowadays, has major competitors (Microsoft/HP/IBM/CA), and will be like speaking greek to biz people (it’s targeted towards SMB’s & mainly enterprise system engineers)…I highly doubt that I can pull it off using just powerpoints. I know that if I had a working product, I can show (prove) that it’s viable & valuable product, better functionality, much easier to use, and of course cheaper than competitors.
So…I would think that many people have the same issue that I do…Can’t afford make the leap to go from side-business to full-time business. I would image some/most have less issues that what I’m facing, maybe just more fear than actual issues.
That’s my defense for me & the rest of my fellow worst offenders.
Any advice?
Angel/VC funding possible/probable with just powerpoints?
May 5th, 2010 at 8:25 pm
Sounds like a rewritten pg essay. Then again most pg essays sound like other pg essays.
.
#2 is nice. My first company in college was doing extremely and money was pouring in but I held back and lost a lot of future opportunities.
May 5th, 2010 at 9:28 pm
This is why my biz partner and I decided to quit our jobs at HP and Microsoft when we started 4 years ago. We figured we’d never really get anything done as a side part-time thing. The good news is we’re still around running our own businesses.
May 6th, 2010 at 4:50 am
You sound like a person that sees failure as a non-option and will do anything just to avoid failure.
Based on what I know about startups, I think you may be setting yourself up for getting stuck in a zombie company. If it is more profitable for a business to fail and for the owners to move on and work on something new and profitable, you’ll end up not doing it and decide to hold on to something that is not workable or profitable. Think about it.
May 7th, 2010 at 12:13 am
Right on Jess, but did you skip #4 – To Really Create – Believe in Failure?
Via the Legendary Malcolm McLaren – Youtube @ 1:10 on the linky
May 7th, 2010 at 6:49 am
Well said and, for what it’s worth, I fully support what you are saying.
May 9th, 2010 at 8:26 am
The only way I can think of to work around this problem is to get angel/VC funding up front (Y-Combinator, et al, primarily focus on Web 2.0). Given that my product is totally different from typical startups nowadays, has major competitors (Microsoft/HP/IBM/CA), and will be like speaking greek to biz people (it’s targeted towards SMB’s & mainly enterprise system engineers)…I highly doubt that I can pull it off using just powerpoints. I know that if I had a working product, I can show (prove) that it’s viable & valuable product, better functionality, much easier to use, and of course cheaper than competitors.
+1
May 10th, 2010 at 7:37 am
I was a #3, and it worked out great, mainly because my work in my day job was actually beneficial to my business.
I agree that burning your ships is a great motivator, and people need to play the psychological card that helps them the most. For some people, that involves having a bit of security, but for others, they just need to jump into the unknown and not look back.
May 14th, 2010 at 1:34 pm
Will Bunker founded match.com when he worked a full time job.
May 14th, 2010 at 5:50 pm
Jessica,
Why so negative? I’m not going to say I apologize, that’s seemingly making my statement less worthy. You are inexperienced in all 3 of these hun. WTHey, people can go to school and still accomplish their goals, Folks can do consulting on the side and still take care of putting the fire out, and for the love of God, people can still work and take risks on the side while reaching their goal.. I’m not ‘comprende’ you sweety.
I’m going to tweet this and ask for help, I could be wrong and maybe one of the exceptions but don’t think so! Peace
May 17th, 2010 at 5:23 am
I completely understand where you’re coming from in this post Jessica, but as some others have pointed out, people don’t all run on the same fuel. That’s to say, what motivates one might not be what motivates another. Burning bridges does certainly put a fire under ones behind, and for some this really will focus the mind. For others though, the insecurity can be too overwhelming. It really depends on the person, and the person’s situation.
At the end of the day, it’s different strokes for different folks.I still think this is a great post, because it gives you something to think about. Nice work.